For-Profit Colleges, Vulnerable G.I.s

Veterans Failing Shows Hazards of For-Profit Schools in GI Bill

These colleges prey on military personnel while they are in the military, plant their seed about how "reputable" they are, and then continue to prey on them once they leave. There needs to be a certification process for these "colleges" and they need to be heavily regulated. The goal of the new G.I. Bill is to help servicemembers transition to civilian life with new skills, and in doing so, better society. Throwing money at bad for-profit educational institutions (there are some good ones...) does none of this.

New G.I. Bill Too Popular for the Pentagon's own good?

The military recruits based on the premise that, "If you join, you will get a free college education." Most of America thinks that is the case. Finally, for many, it is the case.

Echoes of Vietnam in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Hearing Room

This is a fascinating article. Of most importance though is COL(R)Andrew Bacevich's comments stating that today's youth are disengaged from the war; they just don't care. Why? I postulate that it is because there isn't a draft and they aren't in danger. Why would the youth of this nation care about wars in which only one half of one percent of this nation have fought in Iraq/Afghanistan? They think it isn't their problem... "No draft?! No problem with me!" they think to themselves while texting each other about happy hour.

Kerry was quick to resist analogies between Vietnam and Afghanistan on Thursday, but said some commonalities between the conflicts exist.

“Once again, we are fighting an insurgency in a rural country with a weak central government. Our enemy blends in with the local population and easily crosses a long border to find sanctuary in a neighboring country. We ignore these similarities at our peril,” he said.

The importance of veterans’ perspective is another lesson from the Vietnam War, Kerry said.

Three of the four veterans at the witness table spoke in support of a continuing combat presence in Afghanistan – although they also stressed the need for an expansion of its civilian commitment, in line with the Kerry-Lugar proposal.

However, one corporal from California called U.S. operations in the country an “occupation” and opposed Obama’s decision to boost troop levels by 17,000.

“Sending more troops will not make the U.S. safer, it will only build more opposition against us,” said Rick Reyes, who served with the Marines in both Afghanistan and Iraq.

Reyes’ statements were most similar to Kerry’s when he spoke on behalf of Vietnam Veterans Against the War as a 27-year-old recently returned soldier.

Boston University professor and a retired Army Col. Andrew Bacevich observed that the starkest difference between the hearing Thursday and the one in 1971 is public disengagement.

“When the young John Kerry spoke, many of his contemporaries had angrily turned against their generation’s war. Today, most of the contemporaries of those fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan have simply tuned out the Long War,” Bacevich said. “The predominant mood of the country is not one of anger or anxiety, but of dull acceptance.”

On a happier note, Johns Hopkins University may increase veterans' benefits. You don't even have to have gone to Iraq/Afghanistan to get these benefits, you just need to have served in the military.

Nearby Firing Ranges Complicate Soldiers' Recovery from Stress

This is as unbelievable to me as the VA psychologist who urged her staff to refrain from diagnosing PTSD in favor of adjustment disorder (See VA psychologist to staff: don't diagnose PTSD) and members of Congress voting against the "The Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act" (Senate vote by member; House vote by member).